The truth about trading with leverage

Who is James Wynn?

Before making his headlines, James Wynn had already experimented with memokine’s high leverage strategy.

James Wynn is a pseudonymous crypto trader who became famous through Memecoins from 2022 to 2023. One of his early public breakout moves was to transform a modest investment into a multi-million dollar return via Pepe (Pepe) when the market capitalization was small.

That Pepe’s trade established several features of his style: a powerful “narrative” component with high leverage, aggressive risk-taking, and social media and prediction calls.

In early 2025, Wynn moved significantly towards a decentralized derivatives platform, particularly a permanent future for high lipids. These are ways that allow traders to open positions with borrowed capital, expand (and lose) their profits, and hold indefinitely. Wynn has begun running positions with up to 40x leverage at a concept size of $1 billion.

This transition made him the so-called “main character” in the lore of crypto trading. His position was big, transparent and dangerous. He became a symbol of what is possible when combining capital, leverage, social perception and belief, but also of what could be very wrong.

James Wynn’s early Pepe trade and initial profits

By early 2025, Wynn had been taking a bold bet on the rise, drawing attention to his position showing tens of millions of people with unrealized profits.

Wynn had great success before a more dramatic loss. Inspired by a famous internet meme, he invested around $7,000 in Pepe Memecoin in 2023. The token went viral and was partially aided by Wynn’s early entry and promotion through various channels.

By mid-2025, Pepe’s market capitalization had risen to around $10 billion. This coincided with Wynn’s early forecast of a $4.2 billion market capitalization that took place while the token was reportedly valued at nearly $4.2 million. His original investments benefited an estimated $25 million from this growth.

Based on this success, Wynn added a highly leveraged position to his trading practices to decentralized platforms such as high lipids. He used aggressive leveraged trading to win $3 million in stake in just a few months to $100 million. He opened a long Bitcoin position in May 2025, holding 5,520 Bitcoin (BTC) with 40x leverage.

Wynn also recognized the profits along the way. He closed some of his positions while still in Green, earning profits from Pepe and other swing trades. Paper wasn’t the only thing he had in his early success. Sometimes he transformed bold calls into real profits. Within the cryptocurrency community, his moves and his approach were praised and criticized for his quick execution and high risk take.

High leverage positions for ETH and KPEPE Wynn

James Wynn’s loss and what went wrong

Winn’s fate sparked a liquidation that overnight turned around when Bitcoin fell below $105,000, erasing nearly $100 million in his leverage.

The most dramatic collapse occurred in late May 2025 when Wynn’s high lipids (a concept that exceeds $1.25 billion) were unraveled for a long time, 40 times larger BTC. The Bitcoin drop triggered a cascade liquidation that triggered $105,000. The reported losses for that period approached $100 million, turning previous paper profits into a sharp drawdown.

Wynn didn’t just suffer from a total closure. Partial liquidation also played a role. High volatility meant that even before full liquidation, some of his position was automatically closed to protect margins and lacked buffer capital. On June 3, Wynn took a risk of nearly $100 million in his second leveraged Bitcoin bet, publicly sharing liquidation levels, eliciting both community support and criticism. On June 5, 2025, he was partially liquidated three times in an hour, totaling around 379 BTC, at the time, at about $39 million.

Furthermore, Wynn’s exposure to Memecoins and higher volatility assets meant that price fluctuations could be faster. Even when core assets like Bitcoin are relatively stable, leveraged positions have magnified small movements.

In August 2025, James Wynn suffered a loss of $22,627 in the ten-fold leveraged dogecoin position, attributed Memocoin’s liquidation of coordinated action by “Kabal,” signaling his intention to “be the biggest” in anticipation of the end of the market slump.

Graph for June 5, 2025 shows Winn's liquidation

Did you know: The emotional trading and accumulation with more leverage made things worse for Wynn. Instead of eliminating risk after making a profit, he often added to the trade or switched sides with high leverage. A market move that could be easier to manage as a small bet has turned into wipeouts.

Lessons to learn from the James Wynn incident

Win rise and fall indicates that in cryptography, leverage is not just about increasing increases. It’s about how quickly compounding fails to irreversible losses.

For those interested in crypto trading, Wins Saga offers many warning lessons.

Leverage is a double-edged sword

20x, 40x or more – High leverage offers great profit potential, but requires near perfect timing and risk control. Cryptography is very volatile, so even small ticks to you can be a huge loss. Wynn’s experience highlights this: an increase of tens of millions, but losses of roughly the same magnitude, and sometimes even more.

Partial liquidation risk and capital erosion

Without a full wipeout, the repeated partial liquidation during a volatile swing will cut into the margin, deflate the position and drain the account. Risk management should take into account the resistance of continuous losses, not just in the worst case scenario. For Wynn, partial liquidation was often lacking in his deal before the final collapse.

The importance of exit strategies and profits

He frequently extended positions too long or excessively, but Winn booked profits in certain trades, even during his victory. A controlled withdrawal can stop the losing cycle, even if it means giving up some possible benefits.

Platforms and technical risks

Platforms like high lipids offer high leverage, transparency and speed, but also include risk, slippage, funding costs, liquidation, margin calls and even external pressure. The larger the position compared to the liquidity of the platform, the more likely you are to be “focused” and perhaps exposed to more disadvantageous moves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *