While Paxos’ mismining of $300 trillion in PYUSD on Wednesday is undoubtedly alarming, it serves as a case study on why blockchain can shine in traditional banking.

On Wednesday, Paxos accidentally minted $300 trillion worth of PayPal USD (PYUSD) stablecoin, which it described as an “internal technical error.”

But importantly, blockchain allows those mistakes to be quickly identified and corrected.

The incident occurred at 7:12pm (UTC) on October 15th, and was discovered almost immediately by onlookers, resulting in the entire amount being burnt just 22 minutes later.

Banks Can Hide Fat Finger Errors but Crypto Is Transparent
sauce: ted pillows

The same cannot be said for the traditional banking sector.

“Mistakes happen in every financial system. The difference with blockchain is that mistakes are visible, traceable, and immediately fixable,” Kate Cooper, CEO of OKX Australia, told Cointelegraph. “That transparency is a strength, not a weakness,” she added.

Mr Cooper, who spent nearly a decade as an executive at two of Australia’s largest banks before pivoting to cryptocurrencies, said the Paxos case highlights how the openness and transparency of blockchain can transform financial oversight.

“As a former banker, I believe this is proof that visibility builds trust. The same rails that expose mistakes can also strengthen governance and modernize the way value moves within the financial system.”

Level of accountability ‘unprecedented’ in traditional banking

Line Sachs, CEO of cross-chain stablecoin liquidity platform Eco, said blockchain offers a level of accountability rarely seen in traditional finance.

“Perhaps an overlooked aspect of the inevitable on-chain stablecoin economy is the benefit of transparency required of currency issuers. Although this was an extreme case, it is still beneficial,” Sachs told Cointelegraph.

“This level of transparency and real-time coordination is unprecedented in today’s central banking economy.”

Banks have a history of fat finger trading

In April 2024, Citigroup mistakenly credited a customer’s account with $81 trillion instead of $281, and it took several hours to reverse the transaction. The media didn’t learn about it until nearly 10 months later.

That same month, another Citigroup employee almost transferred $6 billion to a wealthy customer after pasting the customer’s account number into the payment amount box. It also took 10 months for the incident to be reported.